logo



Friarsgate Brief - TrustNews Jun 2003

Consultation Draft Feb 2003

Response by the City of Winchester Trust April 2003

Friarsgate development site
Friarsgate development site
Click to enlarge

The following comments arise from meetings of the Trust's Friarsgate Group before and after the presentation by Steven Bee, Director of Development Services, to an open meeting of Trust members on 3rd April.

The Trust congratulates the Planning Department on the straightforward nature of the Brief and the process of public consultation since its publication, particularly as both contrast markedly with the procedure at the time of the Brooks Development. We are also very pleased that on this occasion the Trust is being allowed to contribute to the process.

General Points

1. Consideration of additional areas by the Master Planner

We appreciate that it is important not to over-extend the scope of the Brief, but there are certain adjoining areas that are so directly related to the development that we believe they should be considered at the same time, as supplementary matters. The need for this is to some extent recognised, but it would be a sadly missed opportunity not to go a stage further and obtain the expert views of the Master Planner on how these areas would be affected by his proposals, and how he would recommend that planning policy might be framed for their future. We therefore recommend that an outer, hatched line be drawn on Fig.1 to encompass the following non-development areas for consideration:

friarsgate carpark

2.The existing Multistorey Car Park

The Trust feels very strongly that the present car park building is wholly inappropriate to the character and quality of the centre of Winchester and should not be retained as part of what we all expect to be a development fully worthy of civic pride. We understand that demolition/replacement has a significant financial implication, but the building will in any case require major expenditure to meet present practical standards, and we suspect that its retention would also compromise sensible planning of the area. Moreover, as the photograph illustrates, it is hard to envisage how the development can achieve the design standards set by the Brief if saddled with this ugly and alien element. The views from the improved Friarsgate Road and from the adjoining future re-development of the Cossack Lane Car Park will be equally important.

3. The role of the Master Planner

The Brief is commendably non-prescriptive, but in one or two respects we believe the presentation might appear to limit the freedom of the Master Planner more than is desirable as, for example, where public open spaces are indicated at each of three major intersections. We appreciate that these are diagrammatic and need not be circular, but we suggest that enlarged open spaces at intersections are not characteristic of Winchester, and that the Master Planner should be encouraged to include public open space in whatever manner he feels most appropriate, rather than follow this illustration.

4. Stages of Public Consultation

At this early stage there is no published programme for further public consultation, and the Trust wishes to make sure that the Draft Master Plan will be available for public examination and comment before it is approved by the City Council. It is important that the people of Winchester should have the opportunity to comment on what will be the second stage of the Brief, before any work is started on the preparation of planning applications.

Comments on specific paragraphs in the Draft Brief include

It would be folly for the scheme to attempt to compete in retail or leisure terms with Southampton or Basingstoke.
Concern to ensure that the existing shopping area extends into the new development rather than that the retail centre of gravity should be moved.
Is there a possibility of servicing adjoining shops outside the development area to solve some traffic problems and improve the pedestrian environment?
Support for the retention of the mediaeval street pattern and for the imaginative use of the streams and small open spaces.
Support for the reuse of the Woolstaplers' Hall for community purposes rather than up-market flats but disagreement with the writing off of the Antiques Market which is an equally important building.
Emphasis on the importance of providing public transport access and short-stay parking for the medical centres and post office.
Welcome for the retention of the street market during and after completion of the development.
The future of the Broadway should be a matter for consideration, including its potential as a market site, and the management of coaches.
Misgivings about the siting of the Bus Station.
Support for the design section of the Brief. Encouragement of the use of the 'pentice' as a design element and the proposal for an avenue of trees along Friarsgate.
Detailed appendices covering Public Art and Retail considerations.

Copies of the full document can be obtained from the Trust's website or from The Heritage Centre on receipt of a S.A.E.